Comments on: The magic ingredient for the FitNesse, Spring and Hibernate TDD soup http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/ Building software that matters Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:12:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: gojko http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/comment-page-1/#comment-42619 gojko Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:52:08 +0000 http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/#comment-42619 The same idea can be applied to .NET - this article deals with Java and declarative transactions in Spring provided by its @transactional proxy. If you use Castle or Spring transactions in .NET, similar should apply as you would be using proxies. If you use enterprise transactions, that is not done with proxies but you can manage it similarly. The same idea can be applied to .NET – this article deals with Java and declarative transactions in Spring provided by its @transactional proxy. If you use Castle or Spring transactions in .NET, similar should apply as you would be using proxies. If you use enterprise transactions, that is not done with proxies but you can manage it similarly.

]]> By: Ken http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/comment-page-1/#comment-42610 Ken Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:19:32 +0000 http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/#comment-42610 What conditions must be satisfied for this method of transaction handling to work? Is it necessary that the system under test be written in Java? I'm experimenting with FitNesse for testing .NET code. Is it necessary that the system under test uses Spring, and if so, will the method work if it's using Spring.NET? Can the core idea be applied with .NET, but it would have to be implemented differently? Thanks, Ken What conditions must be satisfied for this method of transaction handling to work? Is it necessary that the system under test be written in Java? I’m experimenting with FitNesse for testing .NET code. Is it necessary that the system under test uses Spring, and if so, will the method work if it’s using Spring.NET? Can the core idea be applied with .NET, but it would have to be implemented differently?

Thanks,
Ken

]]> By: gojko http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/comment-page-1/#comment-40471 gojko Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:57:35 +0000 http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/#comment-40471 i saved lots of time in development as i did not have to do any cleanup, and the tests run a bit quicker for the same reason, but you save lots of time in maintenance as well because tests are automatically repeatable. i saved lots of time in development as i did not have to do any cleanup, and the tests run a bit quicker for the same reason, but you save lots of time in maintenance as well because tests are automatically repeatable.

]]> By: Tom http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/comment-page-1/#comment-40466 Tom Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:20:33 +0000 http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/#comment-40466 Hi gojko, great post, very nice explanations, thanks! Quick question please: am wondering if you found that wrapping all of your Fit tests in transactions significantly sped up your test suite, because it never has commit to the db / reset it?? Many thanks, Tom Hi gojko, great post, very nice explanations, thanks!

Quick question please: am wondering if you found that wrapping all of your Fit tests in transactions significantly sped up your test suite, because it never has commit to the db / reset it??

Many thanks,
Tom

]]> By: Integrating FitNesse with Spring http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/comment-page-1/#comment-26151 Integrating FitNesse with Spring Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:56:04 +0000 http://gojko.net/2008/01/22/spring-rollback/#comment-26151 [...] to this blog posting: The Magic Ingredient for FitNesse, Spring … Could this be it? It’s kind of solving a different (more advanced) problem than we were [...] [...] to this blog posting: The Magic Ingredient for FitNesse, Spring … Could this be it? It’s kind of solving a different (more advanced) problem than we were [...]

]]>