<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to avoid getting lost in translation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gojko.net/2008/01/30/how-to-avoid-getting-lost-in-translation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gojko.net/2008/01/30/how-to-avoid-getting-lost-in-translation/</link>
	<description>Building software that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:28:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/2008/01/30/how-to-avoid-getting-lost-in-translation/comment-page-1/#comment-24564</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/2008/01/30/how-to-avoid-getting-lost-in-translation/#comment-24564</guid>
		<description>Not wishing to &quot;rain on your parade&quot;, but the sensible, descriptive name thing, was one of the first lessons of Computer Science back in 1981.

But you are right, tools shape our language, language shapes our dreams*, and dreams* shape our tools. 

* I&#039;m willing to substitute comprehension for dreams.

BASIC was rejected as a teaching language, not only because of the GOTO thing, but also the 2 letter identifiers (and GOSUB a number). Pascal was in fashion, as well.

We were warned against the cute: in COBOL you can ADD something TO something GIVING something, ADD PEPPER TO CHILE GIVING HEARTBURN, wears a bit thin after the twentieth time to lookup what PEPPER really was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not wishing to &#8220;rain on your parade&#8221;, but the sensible, descriptive name thing, was one of the first lessons of Computer Science back in 1981.</p>
<p>But you are right, tools shape our language, language shapes our dreams*, and dreams* shape our tools. </p>
<p>* I&#8217;m willing to substitute comprehension for dreams.</p>
<p>BASIC was rejected as a teaching language, not only because of the GOTO thing, but also the 2 letter identifiers (and GOSUB a number). Pascal was in fashion, as well.</p>
<p>We were warned against the cute: in COBOL you can ADD something TO something GIVING something, ADD PEPPER TO CHILE GIVING HEARTBURN, wears a bit thin after the twentieth time to lookup what PEPPER really was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
