<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opensource .NET talks schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/</link>
	<description>The Quest for Software++</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gojko</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-33106</link>
		<dc:creator>gojko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/?p=315#comment-33106</guid>
		<description>Not sure where you got that impression. I used script# intensively at the place where I worked most of the last year, and the result did have some leaks but they were mostly due to the way we were mixing DOM objects and dynamic scripts, not specifically related to script# (anyway, I consider those bugs in browsers, not in script#). I certainly would not call it extremely leaky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure where you got that impression. I used script# intensively at the place where I worked most of the last year, and the result did have some leaks but they were mostly due to the way we were mixing DOM objects and dynamic scripts, not specifically related to script# (anyway, I consider those bugs in browsers, not in script#). I certainly would not call it extremely leaky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roelof Blom</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-33102</link>
		<dc:creator>Roelof Blom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/?p=315#comment-33102</guid>
		<description>Isn't it a extremely leaky abstraction? I mean, don't you have to fallback to the generated script to see what goes on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it a extremely leaky abstraction? I mean, don&#8217;t you have to fallback to the generated script to see what goes on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gojko</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-33090</link>
		<dc:creator>gojko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/?p=315#comment-33090</guid>
		<description>In terms of generating JS code from something that can be unit tested and debugged in a real IDE, yes. In terms of widgets and things like that, probably not. But I mostly used it to develop ajax sites in c# and generate JS from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of generating JS code from something that can be unit tested and debugged in a real IDE, yes. In terms of widgets and things like that, probably not. But I mostly used it to develop ajax sites in c# and generate JS from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roelof Blom</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/2008/08/27/opensource-net-talks-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-33088</link>
		<dc:creator>Roelof Blom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/?p=315#comment-33088</guid>
		<description>Is Script# really comparable to GWT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Script# really comparable to GWT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
