Comments on: QUPER model for better requirements http://gojko.net/2009/11/04/quper-model-for-better-requirements/ Building software that matters Fri, 18 May 2012 13:40:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Serhiy Yevtushenko http://gojko.net/2009/11/04/quper-model-for-better-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-67809 Serhiy Yevtushenko Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:04:37 +0000 http://gojko.net/?p=1363#comment-67809 Hi, Gojko. Interesting to see that you liked this model, and dislike (judging from you comments) Tom Gilb's presentation, which is really similar to this ideas (if you look into his Competetive Engineering). As well Tom Gilb work contains more elaborated topic, as, for example, how to choose next increment of the quality attributes (Tom Gilb term instead of non-functional requirements), which should be attacked on the next iteration. Hi, Gojko.
Interesting to see that you liked this model, and dislike (judging from you comments) Tom Gilb’s presentation, which is really similar to this ideas (if you look into his Competetive Engineering). As well Tom Gilb work contains more elaborated topic, as, for example, how to choose next increment of the quality attributes (Tom Gilb term instead of non-functional requirements), which should be attacked on the next iteration.

]]> By: David Evans http://gojko.net/2009/11/04/quper-model-for-better-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-65147 David Evans Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:44:55 +0000 http://gojko.net/?p=1363#comment-65147 Interesting. Seems to owe a lot to Tom Gilb's work on expressing requirements as quantifiable product qualities, which advocates using well-defined meters (the method for measuring a particular quality) and defining various target levels such as current, acceptable, goal etc. Also, the structure and style of the requirement notation looks similar to Gilb's 'Planguage'. Interesting. Seems to owe a lot to Tom Gilb’s work on expressing requirements as quantifiable product qualities, which advocates using well-defined meters (the method for measuring a particular quality) and defining various target levels such as current, acceptable, goal etc.

Also, the structure and style of the requirement notation looks similar to Gilb’s ‘Planguage’.

]]>