<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixture Gallery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gojko.net</link>
	<description>The Quest for Software++</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wes W.</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/#comment-28963</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixture-gallery/#comment-28963</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

The DomainAdapter in FitLibrary allows something similar to the GenericFixture you mentioned.  It does not completely remove the ability in most complex cases for some 'fixture' code  but it greatly reduces it and does not require a tester to know class names.  The DomainAdapter is available in both .Net and Java versions of FitLibrary.  It also offers several ways to do conversion from the strings in the test to your domain objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>The DomainAdapter in FitLibrary allows something similar to the GenericFixture you mentioned.  It does not completely remove the ability in most complex cases for some &#8216;fixture&#8217; code  but it greatly reduces it and does not require a tester to know class names.  The DomainAdapter is available in both .Net and Java versions of FitLibrary.  It also offers several ways to do conversion from the strings in the test to your domain objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gojko</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/#comment-28829</link>
		<dc:creator>gojko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixture-gallery/#comment-28829</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin,

There is no equivalent of generic fixture for .NET as far as I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>There is no equivalent of generic fixture for .NET as far as I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/#comment-28728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixture-gallery/#comment-28728</guid>
		<description>I just heard about a Generic Fixture for FitNesse at http://genericfixture.wiki.sourceforge.net/.
It seems to have only a Java implementation currently.  
Has anyone done similar work (or adapted that Generic Fixture) for use with FitNesse .NET?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard about a Generic Fixture for FitNesse at <a href="http://genericfixture.wiki.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://genericfixture.wiki.sourceforge.net/</a>.<br />
It seems to have only a Java implementation currently.<br />
Has anyone done similar work (or adapted that Generic Fixture) for use with FitNesse .NET?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes W.</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/#comment-28698</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixture-gallery/#comment-28698</guid>
		<description>This is very good information.  I would suggests adding information of the DomainAdapter idea in the latest FitLibrary and SuiteFixture.  These work together well to allow you to have one fixture and talk more directly to domain objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good information.  I would suggests adding information of the DomainAdapter idea in the latest FitLibrary and SuiteFixture.  These work together well to allow you to have one fixture and talk more directly to domain objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fit/Fitnesse Fixture Gallery at Dazed &#38; Confused</title>
		<link>http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixturegallery/#comment-28491</link>
		<dc:creator>Fit/Fitnesse Fixture Gallery at Dazed &#38; Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gojko.net/fitnesse/fixture-gallery/#comment-28491</guid>
		<description>[...] really found the FIT/Fitnesse documentation to be very good, maybe I didn&#8217;t look har enough. This fixturegallery looks like a good place to start and check when you have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really found the FIT/Fitnesse documentation to be very good, maybe I didn&#8217;t look har enough. This fixturegallery looks like a good place to start and check when you have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
